Dashboard

Forms

Listening Meetup

Page banners

Plan landings

Main navigation

Gallery

Upload

Media library

Memberships

All tickets

Create ticket

Prepaid tickets

Users

<p>ELE is a peer-powered community where people leaders don't just reframe challenges — they leave with decisions, next moves, and 30/60/90-day commitments to move real work forward.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>For 22 years, leaders from Fortune 1000 companies have brought their hardest problems here — and left sharper than they arrived.</p>

UPCOMING CALENDAR

LATEST IDEA EXCHANGE

RECENT INSIGHTS

WHO WE ARE

Schedule a Meetup

Vote to Shape

<p class="ql-align-center"><strong>This is where people leaders get sharper — and their teams get smarter.</strong></p><p class="ql-align-center">ELE is a peer-powered network of people leaders who accelerate business results through shared intelligence and real-work collaboration. Learn more below about why ELE has been the trusted choice for leaders building high-performing teams for over 20 years.</p>

About ELE

Schedule a Local Meetup

<p>Bring a real talent challenge. Name what's at stake, what you've tried, and why it matters now.</p>

Community-Powered Calendar

<p>Signal what matters most. Your vote shapes what your peers tackle next.</p>

Companies In Our Network

Contact ELE

<p>Find the peer conversation that moves your work forward.</p><p>The right exchange builds better leaders, closes capability gaps, and cuts through what internal meetings can't.</p>

<p>Figure out if ELE is for you. Straight answers on what ELE is, who it’s built for, and how contributing members actually work together. Still have a question? Contact us.</p>

Get answers about how Executive Learning Exchange (ELE) works — peer-powered leadership development that fixes real work issues, reverses burnout, and accelerates business value. No programs. No vendors. In the flow of work.

<p>Where people leaders share what's working, ask what's hard, and learn from peers navigating the same talent challenges right now.</p><p> Search before you post. When referencing a resource, paste the key insight directly into your response with a link to the source.</p>

<p>Real conversations from people leaders tackling today's toughest talent challenges -- captured live, ready to apply with your teams when it fits your schedule, and connected to what's happening right now.</p>

Insights on Talent Challenges | Captured Peer Conversations | ELE

Welcome

<p>Pick your path — each plan reflects a different commitment to accelerating business value.</p>

ELE Plans — Find your place.

<p>Want ELE to come to you? Propose a local gathering — the community decides what gets scheduled.</p>

Executive Learning Exchange (ELE)

BARYONS

Ágora Learning & Consulting

<div style="font-family: 'Calibri', 'Candara', 'Segoe UI', 'Optima', Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: auto; font-size: 1.1rem;">
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #990000; margin: 20px 0; padding: 10px 20px; background-color: #f8f9fa; font-style: italic; color: #555; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">"We are pushing all of this AI experimentation, but yet, we are not reducing our performance metrics." — <a href="https://www.ele.llc/people/adrienne-guerrero" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Adrienne Guerrero</a>, Positive Delta</blockquote>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">That quote named something most organizations haven't said out loud yet.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">People leaders from CNA Insurance, Combined Insurance, Spencer Stuart, UL Solutions, The Regis Company, and across the ELE community gathered to work through a problem hiding in plain sight: employees aren't keeping skills current — not because they don't care, but because no one's adjusted what gets measured. Perform now, learn later is the rational choice. Until that changes, upskilling is just noise.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>Who was in the room:</strong> Nicole DeFalco facilitated. Vilson Simon, Adrienne Guerrero, and Mike Hruska led breakouts. Matt Sernaker produced. Baryons AI participated live — synthesizing room signals in real time.</p>

<h3 style="font-family: 'Montserrat', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 1.3rem; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 10px; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom: 5px;">The reframe that stopped the room</h3>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">Three breakout perspectives — HR business partner, frontline manager, employee — surfaced the same signal: no one's been given a clear reason why upskilling matters or what's in it for them. Managers aren't being villains. But they're signaling, unintentionally, that delivery wins.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><a href="https://www.ele.llc/people/baryons-aimentor" target="_blank" rel="noopener">BARYONS AI Mentor</a> fed it back:</p>

<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #990000; margin: 15px 0; padding: 5px 20px; font-style: italic; color: #555; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">"If we reframe upskilling as a funded investment in job security, rather than a threat to productivity, we can convert employee fear into innovation."</blockquote>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">That wasn't a framework from a slide. It was the room's own thinking — sharpened. The smiles weren't about the AI output. They were recognition.</p>

<h3 style="font-family: 'Montserrat', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 1.3rem; margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 10px; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom: 5px;">What the room produced</h3>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">A 30/60/90 scaffold: communicate the <em>why</em> in 30 days, adjust metrics to create safe learning zones by day 60, formalize a reward structure for both learning and output by day 90. That thread moves into the <strong>AI Practical Lab on June 11</strong> for deeper implementation work.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><a href="https://www.ele.llc/people/michael-hruska" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mike Hruska</a>'s breakout tested an approach worth stealing: the <strong>AI human sandwich</strong> — human framing first, AI synthesis in the middle, human challenge and iteration at the end. <a href="https://www.ele.llc/people/marty-murrillo" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Marty Murrillo</a> put it simply:</p>

<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #990000; margin: 15px 0; padding: 5px 20px; font-style: italic; color: #555; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">"You have to challenge it, think, and iterate. You're the director."</blockquote>
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://wp.ele.llc/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Baryons-SuperManagers-in-my-pocket.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="640" />
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">That skill — challenging AI output before you act on it — isn't in most upskilling plans yet. It should be.</p>

<h3 style="font-family: 'Montserrat', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 1.3rem; margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 10px; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom: 5px;">The open question nobody answered</h3>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><a href="https://www.ele.llc/people/azizeh-constantinescu" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Azizeh Constantinescu</a>, UL Solutions, asked the one that landed hardest:</p>

<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #990000; margin: 15px 0; padding: 5px 20px; font-style: italic; color: #555; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">"When AI can do the task faster, are we cutting off human growth and development at the knees?"</blockquote>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">Classic change models assume a destination. AI doesn't offer one. Any reskilling strategy built toward a defined endpoint will be obsolete before it's deployed. The leaders getting traction are designing for iteration — not installation.</p>


<hr style="border: 0; border-top: 1px solid #eee; margin: 40px 0;" />
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem; font-style: italic;">June 11, the same co-presenters take this into coaching workflows -- live. If you missed June 5, this is where the work continues.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>Join the June 11 AI Practical Lab:</strong> <a style="color: #0056b3; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" href="https://www.ele.llc/calendar/ai-practical-labs-23" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.ele.llc/calendar/ai-practical-labs-23</a></p>

<div style="background-color: #f1f4f9; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-top: 40px; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>Bring this work forward.</strong></p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">If your organization is stuck on the same double bind — pushing AI adoption without adjusting what gets measured, or asking people to upskill without giving them a reason that connects to their future — this is exactly the kind of real work the ELE community is built for.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">Bring the challenge. Compare signals with trusted peers. Leave with practical next moves you can actually use.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>Submit My Challenge Now:</strong> <a style="color: #0056b3; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" href="https://www.ele.llc/faqs/share-top-of-mind-talent-challenges">https://www.ele.llc/faqs/share-top-of-mind-talent-challenges</a></p>

</div>
</div>

Design Charrette | Simplifying Reskilling to Scale

Future of Work

Digital &amp; AI

dirk.tussing

newton.moore

suzanne.sherry

learning culture

Change Management

azizeh.constantinescu

adrienne.guerrero

marty.murrillo

patricia.ouzounian

karla.pellettiere

matt.sernaker

skills strategy

adrianna.jimenez

david.scherer

rachel.kaberon

ismail.koubaytari

AI Adoption

erin.joslin

michael.hruska

nicole.defalco

performance metrics

reskilling at scale

2Q2026

manager enablement

Design Charrette

human agency

People Leaders

vilson.simon

peer intelligence

baryons.aimentor

kimberly.flood

upskilling barriers

double bind

AI human sandwich

job security

Gainwell Technologies

HumanSide

<div style="font-family: 'Calibri', 'Candara', 'Segoe UI', 'Optima', Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: auto; font-size: 1.1rem;">
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #990000; margin: 20px 0; padding: 10px 20px; background-color: #f8f9fa; font-style: italic; color: #555; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">"We're giving people the most powerful tool of their careers — and rewarding them for using it the laziest way."</blockquote>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>The real work on the table:</strong> Most organizations have already answered the easy question: <em>are we using AI?</em> The harder question — <em>are our people using it well, and do they even know the difference?</em> — is the one almost nobody is answering. For L&amp;D and people leaders, defining what good AI use actually looks like is critical before cognitive atrophy, skill degradation, and gradual disempowerment quietly erode the human judgment organizations depend on.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>Who was in the room:</strong> This working exchange brought together L&amp;D executives, people leaders, and talent strategists from across the ELE community — professionals actively navigating enterprise AI licenses, workforce capability questions, and the pressure to show ROI on tools their teams may or may not be using well.</p>

<h3 style="font-family: 'Montserrat', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 1.3rem; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 10px; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom: 5px;">The system is rewarding the wrong thing</h3>
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #990000; margin: 15px 0; padding: 5px 20px; font-style: italic; color: #555; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">"That was not a tech failure. It was a structural failure."</blockquote>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">The easy button problem isn't a discipline problem. It's a design problem. At most organizations, the professional who uses AI carelessly outperforms the one who uses it carefully — at least on the metrics that currently get measured: license usage, login rates, output volume, and speed.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">When the system rewards the easy button, people press it. That's not laziness. That's the system working exactly as designed — toward the wrong outcome. Until L&amp;D leaders redefine what gets measured, training alone won't change behavior. The incentive structure has to change first.</p>

<h3 style="font-family: 'Montserrat', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 1.3rem; margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 10px; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom: 5px;">What erodes when we stop doing the hard thinking</h3>
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #990000; margin: 15px 0; padding: 5px 20px; font-style: italic; color: #555; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">"Higher confidence in AI correlated with less critical thinking."</blockquote>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">Three peer-reviewed studies surfaced during the working exchange aren't reassuring. MIT showed measurable cognitive debt in writers using AI, including memory retention issues and a reduced ability to integrate personal understanding with completed work. The Lancet tracked endoscopists using AI assistance for three months and found measurable skill degradation after tools were removed. Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon found that higher confidence in AI correlated directly with less critical thinking. This is the research backdrop behind the eight capacities of human agency — identifying what AI structurally cannot replace, but can degrade through disuse.</p>

<h3 style="font-family: 'Montserrat', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 1.3rem; margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 10px; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom: 5px;">The two capacities L&amp;D must protect</h3>
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #990000; margin: 15px 0; padding: 5px 20px; font-style: italic; color: #555; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">"When we give away our critical decision-making, we give away more than we realize."</blockquote>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">Two of the eight capacities are especially at risk, and especially relevant to the clarity and confidence people leaders need to act well in an AI-assisted environment:</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>The Weight Bearer</strong> is the human capacity to have skin in the game — to feel the stakes because your name is on the work. When people hand AI their ideation, structure, and key decisions, they don't just save time. They quietly surrender the ownership instinct that makes their work credible and defensible.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>The Course Corrector</strong> is the meta-capacity: noticing when something is off and doing something about it. It's the capacity that catches AI's errors before they ship. It's also the one most directly degraded by over-reliance on the easy button.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">Both capacities are skills. They're built through use and eroded through avoidance — which means L&amp;D has direct leverage over whether they survive AI adoption or quietly disappear.</p>

<h3 style="font-family: 'Montserrat', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 1.3rem; margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 10px; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom: 5px;">The investment gap hiding in plain sight</h3>
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #990000; margin: 15px 0; padding: 5px 20px; font-style: italic; color: #555; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">"Trained humans don't follow your AI strategy. They become it."</blockquote>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">Boston Consulting Group's framework for AI investment suggests 70% should go to people and process, 20% to data architecture, and 10% to tools and algorithms. Most organizations have that ratio flipped. The distinction produces fundamentally different outcomes. Systems — policies, gates, validators — are necessary. They're the floor, but they only produce compliance. People — trained judgment, ownership, the ability to catch what AI gets wrong and reinvent what it can augment — produce capability. And capability compounds in ways compliance never will.</p>


<hr style="border: 0; border-top: 1px solid #eee; margin: 40px 0;" />

<h3 style="font-family: 'Montserrat', sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 1.3rem; margin-bottom: 15px;">What to try next</h3>
<ol style="padding-left: 25px; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 15px;"><strong>Ask the governance question this week.</strong> Find out whether your organization has a written, org-wide standard for what good AI use looks like — and who owns the answer. <em>Early evidence:</em> If three people give you three different answers, the gap is confirmed and you have the business case to close it.</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 15px;"><strong>Add one qualitative signal to your AI measurement.</strong> Ask managers to include a "walk me through how you used AI on this" question in their next round of 1:1s — before reviewing the output. <em>Early evidence:</em> If people struggle to explain their process or can't identify what they changed, the Weight Bearer and Course Corrector capacities are already at risk on your team.</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 15px;"><strong>Map your AI investment ratio against the BCG framework.</strong> Make a rough honest estimate: what percentage of your current AI spend is going to systems versus people development? <em>Early evidence:</em> If the ratio is inverted — heavy on tools and compliance, light on trained judgment — that number becomes the opening line of your next budget conversation.</li>
</ol>
<div style="background-color: #f1f4f9; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; margin-top: 40px; font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>Bring your work into the room</strong></p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;">If this connects to real work you are trying to move forward, bring it into the ELE community. Share the challenge, compare signals with trusted peers, and leave with practical next moves you can use.</p>
<p style="font-family: 'Calibri', sans-serif; font-size: 1.1rem;"><strong>Submit My Challenge Now:</strong> <a style="color: #0056b3; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" href="https://www.ele.llc/faqs/share-top-of-mind-talent-challenges">https://www.ele.llc/faqs/share-top-of-mind-talent-challenges</a></p>

</div>
</div>

The Easy Button Problem| The catch-22 at the heart of AI adoption.

Performance Improvement

L&amp;D strategy

jenny.massoni

AI governance

dustin.brewer

wise2026

Executive Learning Exchange

AI fluency

insights-wise-2026

easy button problem

workforce capability

Cognitive Debt

Gradual Disempowerment

People Development

AI Measurement

Systems vs People Investment

Skill Degradation

<div style="font-family: 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.8; max-width: 850px; margin: auto; text-align: justify; font-size: 18px;">
<h4 style="font-size: 1.75rem; color: #1a1a1a; margin-top: 2.5rem; margin-bottom: 1.2rem; border-left: 5px solid #cc0000; padding-left: 15px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.3;">AI as an Amplifier, Not a Replacement</h4>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5rem;">In the rush to adopt generative tools, many organizations are asking, "How can AI do this for us?" Ben Shneiderman’s <b><i>Human-Centered AI</i></b> suggests a more powerful question: "How can AI help our people do things they never could before?"</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 2.5rem;">Shneiderman, a pioneer in computer science, argues against the "Black Box" approach to AI. Instead, he advocates for systems that are reliable, safe, and trustworthy. For HR and L&amp;D leaders, this book serves as a vital guide for navigating the digital transformation without losing the human agency that drives innovation and culture.</p>


<hr style="border: 0; border-top: 1px solid #eee; margin: 2.5rem 0;" />

<h4 style="font-size: 1.75rem; color: #1a1a1a; margin-top: 2.5rem; margin-bottom: 1.2rem; border-left: 5px solid #cc0000; padding-left: 15px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.3;">The Blueprint: High Automation + High Human Control</h4>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5rem;">Shneiderman’s core thesis challenges the idea that "Machine Automation" and "Human Control" are on opposite ends of a single spectrum. Instead, he introduces a two-dimensional model where we can have <b>both</b>:</p>

<ul style="padding-left: 25px; margin-bottom: 2.5rem;">
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>The HCAI Framework:</b> This model encourages designing systems that provide high levels of automation to handle the "drudge work," while simultaneously giving humans high levels of control to make the final, critical decisions.</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>The Four Goals:</b> He focuses on making AI systems <b>Reliable</b> (predictable behavior), <b>Safe</b> (avoiding unintended harm), <b>Trustworthy</b> (transparent processes), and <b>Accountable</b> (clear human responsibility).</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Design for Empowerment:</b> The goal is not "Human-in-the-loop" (where the human just monitors the machine) but "Human-in-the-group" (where the machine is a teammate).</li>
</ul>

<hr style="border: 0; border-top: 1px solid #eee; margin: 2.5rem 0;" />

<h4 style="font-size: 1.75rem; color: #1a1a1a; margin-top: 2.5rem; margin-bottom: 1.2rem; border-left: 5px solid #cc0000; padding-left: 15px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.3;">Why It Matters for the ELE Community</h4>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5rem;">For the senior leaders in the ELE network, this book provides the philosophical and practical guardrails needed for the current AI era:</p>

<ul style="padding-left: 25px; margin-bottom: 2.5rem;">
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Ethical Leadership:</b> As L&amp;D and HR leaders oversee the implementation of AI in hiring and training, Shneiderman’s focus on accountability helps ensure these systems remain unbiased and transparent.</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Future of Skills:</b> It reframes the "upskilling" conversation. Instead of teaching people to compete with AI, we should be teaching them how to command AI to extend their own capabilities.</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Culture of Trust:</b> AI adoption often triggers anxiety. By championing a "Human-Centered" approach, ELE members can lead a transition that feels empowering to employees rather than threatening.</li>
</ul>

<hr style="border: 0; border-top: 1px solid #eee; margin: 2.5rem 0;" />

<div style="font-style: italic; color: #444; background-color: #f4f4f4; padding: 30px; border-radius: 12px; border-right: 5px solid #cc0000;">As we integrate AI into the fabric of our organizations, our success will not be measured by the sophistication of the algorithms, but by the enhanced capacity of our people. Shneiderman reminds us that the goal of technology is not to replicate human intelligence, but to support human achievement. By putting people at the center of the AI equation, we ensure that digital transformation remains a deeply human endeavor.</div>
</div>

Human-Centered AI

future of work

leadership

digital transformation

innovation

talent management

workforce development

organizational culture

Ethical AI

human-centered ai

augmentation

tech ethics

systems design

<div style="font-family: 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.8; max-width: 850px; margin: auto; text-align: justify; font-size: 18px;">
<h4 style="font-size: 1.75rem; color: #1a1a1a; margin-top: 2.5rem; margin-bottom: 1.2rem; border-left: 5px solid #cc0000; padding-left: 15px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.3;">Reclaiming the Wheel from the Tech Hype</h4>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5rem;">For too long, the conversation around artificial intelligence has been hijacked by a relentless flood of technical jargon, vendor sales pitches, and dramatic headlines predicting either utopian efficiency or immediate workforce displacement. This intense noise has created a dangerous form of executive paralysis. Many senior leaders have retreated, ceding strategic control of AI adoption entirely to their IT departments or third-party vendors, treating it as a software upgrade rather than a fundamental change in how the enterprise operates.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 2.5rem;">In <b><i>The AI-Savvy Leader: Nine Ways to Take Back Control and Make AI Work</i></b>, David De Cremer delivers a vital wake-up call for senior business executives. AI is not an IT initiative; it is a leadership mandate. De Cremer argues that technology should never dictate an organization’s vision or culture. Instead, leaders must build the strategic fluency required to confidently step back into the driver’s seat, ensuring that algorithms serve human objectives, protect corporate values, and actively empower the workforce.</p>


<hr style="border: 0; border-top: 1px solid #eee; margin: 2.5rem 0;" />

<h4 style="font-size: 1.75rem; color: #1a1a1a; margin-top: 2.5rem; margin-bottom: 1.2rem; border-left: 5px solid #cc0000; padding-left: 15px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.3;">The Blueprint: Nine Imperatives for Strategic Command</h4>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5rem;">The book moves beyond theoretical ethics and provides a highly practical, behavioral checklist for modern leadership capability. To transition from a reactive observer to an AI-savvy navigator, an executive must focus on three core pillars:</p>

<ul style="padding-left: 25px; margin-bottom: 2.5rem;">
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Demystifying the Black Box:</b> Leaders do not need to learn how to write code, but they must develop a deep conceptual understanding of what their algorithms are doing. This baseline technical fluency is essential to ask the right, critical questions, challenge automated insights, and prevent the organization from falling into the trap of blind algorithmic compliance.</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Prioritizing Human Agency and Judgement:</b> While machines excel at processing vast data sets and predicting patterns, they lack context, empathy, and ethical awareness. An AI-savvy leader designs operational guardrails that keep critical, high-stakes decisions firmly in human hands, protecting the organization's unique competitive advantage—its human intuition.</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Building Algorithmic Trust and Transparency:</b> AI transformation stalls when the workforce views tools with deep suspicion or anxiety. True digital maturity requires leaders to build open, transparent systems where employees clearly understand how data is collected, how decisions are made, and how tech adoption directly enhances their own job security and day-to-day impact.</li>
</ul>

<hr style="border: 0; border-top: 1px solid #eee; margin: 2.5rem 0;" />

<h4 style="font-size: 1.75rem; color: #1a1a1a; margin-top: 2.5rem; margin-bottom: 1.2rem; border-left: 5px solid #cc0000; padding-left: 15px; text-align: left; line-height: 1.3;">Why It Matters for the ELE Community</h4>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1.5rem;">For the senior HR, talent, and L&amp;D executives in the ELE network who are actively designing the enterprise architecture of tomorrow, De Cremer's research offers a critical strategic anchor:</p>

<ul style="padding-left: 25px; margin-bottom: 2.5rem;">
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Redesigning Executive Education:</b> Traditional leadership development programs often focus exclusively on soft skills or legacy management frameworks. This book provides L&amp;D leaders with a robust framework to update their executive benches, blending core human leadership qualities with strategic digital fluency.</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Leading the Change Management Strategy:</b> Digital adoption is fundamentally a psychological and cultural challenge, not a technical one. Senior talent executives can utilize these nine ways to construct comprehensive change management plans that reduce workforce resistance, dissolve tech-anxiety, and build a cohesive culture of continuous upskilling.</li>
 	<li style="margin-bottom: 1.2rem;"><b>Protecting the Core Organizational Culture:</b> As automation integrates into daily operations, the risk of culture erosion increases. HR leaders must act as the primary guardians of human connection, leveraging De Cremer’s principles to ensure that technological integration reinforces, rather than dismantles, the values that make your company thrive.</li>
</ul>

<hr style="border: 0; border-top: 1px solid #eee; margin: 2.5rem 0;" />

<div style="font-style: italic; color: #444; background-color: #f4f4f4; padding: 30px; border-radius: 12px; border-right: 5px solid #cc0000;">Leading in the age of artificial intelligence does not require us to become machines; it requires us to become more intentionally human. When we develop the structural confidence to reclaim strategic control from the tech hype, we ensure our digital transformations remain profoundly human-centered. Let's stop letting the algorithms drive our vision and start designing organizations where technology serves human achievement.</div>
</div>